RESUMO
Introduction: COPD causes high morbidity and mortality and high health costs. Thus, identifying and analyzing the distinctive and treatable traits seems useful to optimize the management of AEPOC patients. While various biomarkers have been researched, no solid data for systematic use have been made available. Aim: Assessing the short-term prognostic usefulness of clinical and analytical parameters available in routine clinical practice in COPD exacerbations. Material and methods: Multicenter prospective observational study conducted between 2016 and 2018. Patients admitted for COPD exacerbation who agreed to participate and signed an informed consent form were included. Prolonged stay, in-hospital mortality or early readmission was considered an unfavorable progression. 30-Day mortality was also analyzed. Results: 615 patients were included. Mean age was 73.9 years (SD 10.6); 86.2% were male. Progression of 357 patients (58%) was considered unfavorable. Mortality at 1 month from discharge was 6.7%. The multivariate analysis shows a relationship between the CRP/Albumin ratio and unfavorable progression (OR 1.008, 95% CI 1.00; 1.01), as well as increased risk of death at 1 month from discharge with elevated urea (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.005; 1.02) and troponin T (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.06; 4.62). Conclusion: Elevated CRP/Albumin, urea and TnT are prognostic indicators of poor short-term outcome in patients admitted for COPD exacerbation. Cardiovascular comorbidity and systemic inflammation could explain these findings.
Introducción: : La EPOC provoca una elevada morbimortalidad y elevados costes sanitarios. Identificar y analizar los rasgos distintivos y tratables parece útil para optimizar el tratamiento de los pacientes con AEPOC. Se han investigado varios biomarcadores sin que de momento se disponga de datos sólidos para su uso sistemático. Objetivo: Evaluar la utilidad pronóstica a corto plazo de los parámetros clínicos y analíticos disponibles en la práctica clínica habitual en las exacerbaciones de la EPOC. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo multicéntrico realizado entre 2016 y 2018. Se incluyeron pacientes ingresados por exacerbación de EPOC que aceptaron participar y que firmaron consentimiento informado. Se consideró evolución desfavorable la estancia prolongada, la mortalidad hospitalaria o el reingreso precoz. También se analizó la mortalidad a 30 días. Resultados: Se incluyeron 615 pacientes. La edad media fue 73,9 años (DE 10,6); El 86,2% eran varones. Se consideró desfavorable la evolución de 357 pacientes (58%). La mortalidad al mes del alta fue del 6,7%. El análisis multivariante muestra una relación entre el ratio PCR/Albúmina y la progresión desfavorable (OR 1,008, IC 95% 1,00; 1,01), así como un mayor riesgo de muerte al mes del alta con urea elevada (OR 1,01, IC 95% 1,005; 1,02) y troponina T (OR 2,21; IC del 95%: 1,06; 4,62). Conclusión: La elevación de PCR/albúmina, la urea y la TnT son indicadores de mal pronóstico a corto plazo en pacientes ingresados por exacerbación de la EPOC. La comorbilidad cardiovascular y la inflamación sistémica podrían explicar estos hallazgos.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between asthma and bronchiectasis, as well as the necessary conditions that this connection must meet for this group of patients to be considered a special phenotype. DATA SOURCES: We performed a PubMed search using the MeSH terms "asthma" and "bronchiectasis." The literature research was limited to clinical trials, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and systematic reviews, involving adult patients, published until November 30th, 2022. STUDY SELECTIONS: Selected papers were initially evaluated by the Authors, to assess their eligibility in contributing to the statements. RESULTS: The prevalence of bronchiectasis is higher than expected in patients with asthma, particularly in those with more severe disease, and in some patients, between 1.4% and 7% of them, asthma alone could be the cause of bronchiectasis. Both diseases share etiopathogenic mechanisms, such as neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation, altered airway microbiota, mucus hypersecretion, allergen sensitization, immune dysfunction, altered microRNA, dysfunctional neutrophilic activity, and variants of the HLA system. Besides that, they also share comorbidities, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease and psychiatric illnesses. The clinical presentation of asthma is very similar to patients with bronchiectasis, which could cause mistakes with diagnoses and delays in being prescribed the correct treatment. The coexistence of asthma and bronchiectasis also poses difficulties for the therapeutic focus. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence available seems to support that the asthma-bronchiectasis phenotype really exists although longitudinal studies which consistently demonstrate that asthma is the cause of bronchiectasis are still lacking.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) caused by biomass smoke (B-COPD) has some differences from tobacco-induced-COPD (T-COPD), but acute exacerbations (AECOPD) have not been well characterized in B-COPD. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence, characteristics and outcomes of AECOPD in B-COPD with those of T-COPD. METHODS: A retrospective observational study that included consecutive patients seen at a specialized COPD clinic (2008-2021). The incidence of severe AECOPD that required hospital admission was studied. For the first AECOPD, the following variables were recorded: fever, coexistence of pneumonia, purulent sputum, eosinophil count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, hypercapnia, and respiratory acidosis. Outcome variables were intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of hospital stay, and mortality within 1 month of hospital admission. RESULTS: Of 1060 subjects, 195 (18.4%) belonged to the B-COPD group and 865 (81.6%) to the T-COPD group. During a follow-up of 67.9 (37.8-98.8) months, 75 (38.4%) patients in the B-COPD group and 319 (36.8%) in the T-COPD group suffered at least one severe AECOPD. The only difference between groups was in a higher risk of ICU admission for the T-COPD group. The incidence, characteristics, and the rest of the outcomes of AECOPD were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: AECOPD are similar events for B-COPD and T-COPD and should be managed similarly.
